Charlotte Paper Discontinues Dedicated NASCAR Writer Position

Dave Fulton
@dave-fulton
9 years ago
9,137 posts

He wouldn't rank at the top of the heap as most folk's favorite racing writer, but it is a sad commentary on both the state of the printed newspaper and the state of NASCAR to read that The Charlotte Observer will no longer have a dedicated NASCAR writer.

ThatsRacin

July 20, 2015

NASCAR writer Jim Utter bids farewell to the Observer

After 24 years at the newspaper, Jim Utter begins new challenge

Utter followed Tom Higgins, David Poole on NASCAR beat




--
"Any Day is Good for Stock Car Racing"

updated by @dave-fulton: 12/05/16 04:04:08PM
TMC Chase
@tmc-chase
9 years ago
4,073 posts

NASCAR has done a good bit to surprise me the last 10-15 years - but perhaps nothing more than the way it has managed to completely dominate its media coverage. The NFL and MLB have done a lot of it as well, but I'm not sure they've shut down any critical analysis of their respective product as NASCAR has managed to do.

And as the France brass severely restricted the story line, the print media has absolutely cratered. One obviously didn't cause the other, but they did seem to happen at the same time.

On the motorsports side, David Poole and Chris Economaki are dead. Larry Woody, Monte Dutton, Mike Mulhern, Tom Higgins, etc. retired or were squeezed out. I just don't know of any prominent writer on the circuit.

Longer term, I'll shrug my shoulders over the declining coverage of racing in the papers. I'll have to accept it for what it is or seek alternate sources such as blogs and websites.

My bigger concern is for the nation as a whole. The number and quality of press outlets are shrinking.The reporting has been condensed to a handful of mega-organizations with the same drivel content syndicated out to a multitude of other outlets.

I realize I'm part of the problem. I really no longer have any interest in a physical paper. But I DO enjoy searching through old newspapers on-line, on microfilm, etc. Whatever was printed - good, bad or ugly - has often been retained for future generations in libraries and such.

With an ever-increasing digital press, I fear many columns, articles, op-ed pieces, historical quotes and images, etc. can be conveniently tidied-up in the future or disappear altogether. Already, it's extremely tough to retrieve articles from traditional papers after more than 90 days - at least without paying a handsome fee to view it.




--
Schaefer: It's not just for racing anymore.
Dave Fulton
@dave-fulton
9 years ago
9,137 posts

I do continue to subscribe to the Charlotte paper and like the real feel of newsprint in my hand each morning. Today's announcement coincided with the Charlotte paper's latest reinvention of itself to a USA Today lookalike with LOTS of white space.




--
"Any Day is Good for Stock Car Racing"
TMC Chase
@tmc-chase
9 years ago
4,073 posts

We too get The Tennessean but only on Sunday now. I've been trying to cancel it for ages, but wife won't let me. Reason: coupons. *Sigh*

But I can fetch the paper; skim 3 sports pages, 2 business pages and 1 county page; and be done with it literally in 90 seconds.

Racing coverage plummeted after Larry Woody's retirement / forceout a few years ago. All we get our limited wire copy reports including from tracks such as Bristol, Talladega and Kentucky - all within a few hours of Nashville.

Tennessean doesn't even cover the fairgrounds track events anymore. That's as much on Tony Formosa Jr as the leaseholder / promoter as it is the paper. Nonetheless, it's a far cry from the articles I used to clip on a daily basis ages ago.




--
Schaefer: It's not just for racing anymore.