House Defeats Ga. Congressman's Bill to End Military Sponsorships 216-202; Martial Music Also Survives

Dave Fulton
@dave-fulton
12 years ago
9,137 posts

Although Stewart-Hass has already lost the Army because they said their sponsorship of Ryan Newman wasn't a great investment, looks like Junebug is safe with the National Guard (if they want to stay around) following a late night vote in the United States House of Representatives. We can also look forward to still hearing a good military band play our National Anthem rather than endure those awful "artist" renditions.

Vote: House preserves military sponsorships for IndyCar, NASCAR
6:03 AM

Jul. 19, 2012

Indianapolis Star

WASHINGTON -- IndyCar, NASCAR and bass fishing can count on the military to keep the sponsorship money coming.

The House voted Wednesday night to continue spending millions for the military to back sports to attract recruits for the all-volunteer force. On a vote of 216-202, the House rejected an amendment by Reps. Jack Kingston, R-Ga., and Betty McCollum, D-Minn., that would have trimmed $72.3 million for sports sponsorships from a $608 billion defense bill for fiscal 2013.

The measure had targeted the money the National Guard spends to sponsor Dale Earnhardt Jr., NASCAR's most popular driver, as well as IndyCar Series driver JR Hildebrand. It also would have cut money the Army spends on the National Hot Rod Association drag racing, funds the Marine Corps uses for the Ultimate Fighting Championship and money spent on bass fishing.

Kingston and McCollum had challenged their colleagues' resolve to cut federal spending as the nation grapples with the trillion-plus deficit. House Republicans, their majority larger thanks to the 2010 class of tea party freshmen, have insisted on fiscal discipline and backed deep budget cuts in numerous domestic programs.

The House also rejected an effort by McCollum to reduce the budget for the military's 140 bands and 5,000 full-time musicians from $388 million to $200 million. The congresswoman had questioned the need to spend nearly $4 billion over the next decade on military bands and musical performances.

The House spent most of the day and night debating the far-reaching defense legislation that provides money for war, troops and weapons next year. Yet talk of Earnhardt's No. 88, bass fishing and NASCAR dominated the discussion.

Kingston, a Georgian who says he hails from NASCAR and military country, insisted that the sponsorship money was ineffective, attracting few recruits, and made no sense as the Army shrinks from a peak of 570,000 to 490,000 and the Marine Corps drops by 20,000, to 182,000. The end of the Iraq war, the drawdown in Afghanistan and the nation's fiscal woes have reshaped the defense budget, which has nearly doubled in the last 10 years.

"If someone is going to sign away five or six years of their life, it's going to take more than an ad on an automobile," Kingston told reporters at a Capitol Hill news conference prior to the floor debate.

He said the money should be spent on hiring more recruiters, not military sponsorships.

"We're in a fiscal crisis here," said Minnesota's McCollum. "Bass fishing is not national security."

But the two faced strong opposition from members of North Carolina's congressional delegation as well as lawmakers from Mississippi and Florida.

North Carolina is home to Charlotte Motor Speedway, and the base for most NASCAR teams. The NASCAR Hall of Fame is located in Charlotte adjacent to one of NASCAR's main offices. Its headquarters are in Daytona Beach, Fla.

Republican Rep. Sue Myrick dismissed the amendment as micromanaging the military's recruiting. Democratic Rep. Larry Kissell said the relationship between the military and NASCAR was critical.

Rep. Steven Palazzo, R-Miss., said there was "no reason Congress should be telling the Department of Defense where and how to spend money." In fact, Congress repeatedly instructs the Pentagon on how to spend the money it appropriates.

The effort by Kingston and McCollum suffered an early blow when a separate provision of the bill barring funds for sponsoring professional and semiprofessional motorsports and other sports was ruled out of order by the presiding officer in the House.

The Obama administration has threatened a veto of the overall defense bill after lawmakers abandoned the budget levels they agreed to last year and added $3 billion to preserve some programs and add money to others. Specifically, the bill blocks the Pentagon's plans to retire or transfer various aircraft, including C-27Js, C-23s and a version of the Global Hawk unmanned aerial vehicle.

By voice vote, the House approved an amendment that would cut half the U.S. aid to Pakistan, reducing the amount to $650 million.

Rep. Ted Poe, R-Texas, called Pakistan the "Benedict Arnold" of nations and complained about the level of Islamabad's cooperation in the fight against terrorism. Members of Congress are particularly angry with Pakistan's conviction of Shakil Afridi, the doctor who helped the United States track down Osama bin Laden but was sentenced to 33 years for high treason.

"Pakistan doesn't deserve American money," Poe said.

Various sports leagues weighed in this week on the military sponsorships, sending a letter to Republican and Democratic leaders urging them to oppose the amendment.

"Sports marketing has long been an important element in the U.S. Armed Forces' efforts to reach young adults and active duty personnel regarding the military's missions and objectives that serve our country," said the letter to House Republican and Democratic leaders from NASCAR, IZOD IndyCar series, Major League Baseball, the National Football League and the National Basketball Association.

"The benefits from these types of sponsorships offset the minimal costs to taxpayers," the letter said.

In recent days, the Army ended its sponsorship with Stewart-Haas Racing, with the service saying the money was not a great investment.




--
"Any Day is Good for Stock Car Racing"

updated by @dave-fulton: 12/05/16 04:04:08PM
bill mcpeek
@bill-mcpeek
12 years ago
820 posts

Sounds to me like he does know what he's talking about. His statement that "we need to hire more recruiters" is what is needed is incorrect.. We dont hire civilian contract recruiters. The ones I have seen and talked to are all military people. Why not just train or re-train and assign them as recruiters....Two years ago NASCAR asked myself and 3 of my fellow club members to display our cars at the track outside the 4th turn. We were parked next to the 88 car and the National Guard men and women that were there. The steady parade all day long for 3 days was very impressive. I don't know how many they recruited but they certainly had thousands to talk to as they gave out posters of Dale,Jr. and the 88 car.

Santus Gore
@santus-gore
12 years ago
10 posts

Wonder if we can get the Navy band to come out to the track now....... "Anchors Aweigh, m' boys, Anchors Aweigh...." God I love that song !! LOL

Johnny Mallonee
@johnny-mallonee
12 years ago
3,259 posts

Just read it and seen where bill Mcpeek wrote and I was just before hitting on HIRING RECRUITERS????