Inquisitive Old Man Discusses Art, Auto Racing and Yelling at Kids

Dave Fulton
@dave-fulton
11 years ago
9,137 posts

I just stumbled upon a blog by a West Virginian who calls himself Inquisineer.

The subject of this blog was the look of race cars back in the day and now. What really attracted me was the one photo and those of you who know me will know why.

I've included the writer's "About Me" preface before the actual blog. Hope he wasn't one of the NASA fellows I met on the race train from Washington/Richmond to Rockingham in 1966! I think you'll find this entertaining. I could really relate.

About Me

West Virginia
I grew up in the Parkersburg area before going to the University of Charleston for a political science degree, and then to WVU for both an MPA and a JD. Never really wanting to be a traditional lawyer, I was selected for what is now called the Presidential Management Fellowship program, and worked at NASA Headquarters in DC before transferring to the U.S. Treasury Department (to get back to West Virginia). In my spare time, I was elected to two terms on the Wood County Board of Education, and then went on to teach American Government and Constitutional Law at WVU-Parkersburg.

Sunday, April 28, 2013

Art and Auto Racing

Yes, I am officially becoming an old guy. One way I can tell is my reaction to my favorite sport of auto racing.
Im much more critical of it now than when I was younger, and on many different fronts. I recently attended some dirt track stock car races (late models and modifieds) that inspired this rant. For this essay, I will focus on one aspect in particularthe way the cars look today.

You see, Ive always liked auto racing because it is such a multi-sensorial experience.

You watch it with your eyes, you hear them roar by with your ears (and sometimes feel the noise in your chest), and you can often smell burning rubber, fuel additives, or even just the popcorn from the concession stand (which can also be tasted). But the artist in me has always enjoyed the beauty of racing cars. A mechanic can build a basic race car, but the way it looksthe color scheme chosen, the font style of the number, etc.all contribute towards giving the car personality. Since you dont see the driver like you can a baseball or basketball player, the car becomes a representative of him (or her). It doesnt have to be worthy of an art museum, but good ones convey a personality.

In the old days, race cars were hand lettered, often by local sign painters. In todays world, cars are wrapped instead of painted, using giant decals created on a computer screen. The computer makes it easy for people to lose sight of a simple design and instead go over the top with a complicated array of colors that looks like someone dumped the crayon box into a blender.

The cars themselves dont have the character that cars had in the old days. I liked it best when stock cars used auto bodies from real cars. You could readily tell a Chevelle from a Road Runner, or a Firebird from a Mustang, because that is what they started off as being. There was often a wide variety of body types. Unfortunately, todays cars dont use real car bodies, and they all look the sameslab-sided slanted boxes (rhomboid racers?)resulting in less personality.

To make things worse, they typically hide these cars inside a huge white box for no one to see. Most teams have big rig haulers that allow them to bring an entire garage with them for support at the race track. In the good old days, race cars traveled on open haulers, to amaze and inspire people (especially kids) along the way.

While most of the preceding comments were based on dirt track stock car racing, that doesnt mean that other forms of racing are immune from this problem. Sprint cars were better when they had rounded bodies and not much around the driver, making it easy to see the driver working the steering wheel. Now theyve all became carbon copy downtube cars, with wedge shaped hoods and body panels encapsulating the driver. Plus, they also have the crayons-in-the-blender fancy wraps!

Heck, even NASCAR and NHRA Funny Cars were more realistic (and thus more interesting) when I was younger. While I appreciate the thought behind their effort, I think the attempt by NASCAR to create fake Mustangs, Camaros, and Challengers in the Nationwide Series is absolutely ridiculous, because it is all the same body, with just minor deviations.

Fortunately, there was one fantastic race car at last weekends race. Near the concession stand, a historic car was on display for folks to see. It was a replica of Ray Hendricks Flying 11 1937 Chevy modified that ran on paved tracks in NASCARs modified series. I was very fortunate to see this car run in the late 60s and through the 70s, whenever we went to Martinsville Speedway in Virginia. I was glad to see the car again. To me, this is a real race car! And yes, I am officially an old man yearning for the good old days! Now if you will please excuse me, I need to go yell at some kids to get off my lawn.

Now this is what I call a race car with personality!




--
"Any Day is Good for Stock Car Racing"

updated by @dave-fulton: 12/16/16 07:54:05AM
Andy DeNardi
@andy-denardi
11 years ago
365 posts

I'm in 100% agreement. I know that they can't go back to "stock" bodies for safety reasons; the actual cars are too small to build a cocoon around the driver. Plus there's the whole problem with the true cars being four doors with front wheel drive. You just can't package a race car in those dimensions.

NASCAR is aware that this is a problem; they're trying to get back to something closer to what we had in the Eighties. But in my mind they haven't succeeded yet. Until they go back to some kind of homologation that prevents FWD sedans from competition, I don't think they can succeed. I'm willing to have them run bigger Lincolns and Cadillacs. Before the Chevy V8, a Cadillac was considered a muscle car and many hot rods and home-built sports cars used engines from luxury cars. Cadillacs ran LeMans, Lincolns won the Pan-American road race, Chryslers cleaned up in NASCAR.

I also miss the simpler paint jobs and would enjoy the racing much more if they had simple graphics in no more than three colors and kept the same scheme for the entire season. I think all of us can describe several teams' paint jobs from fifty years ago in vivid detail but can't tell you what the #43 looked like five races ago. And it's not because we're old and feeble-minded.