What constitutes "vintage" racing?
Those who know me...know what my opinions are. for those who don't know me...here they are. We would like to hear yours.
To me there are three basic categories of vintage racing....and to me...all are legitimate.
1). Original equipment with a traceable history. Maintained in "original" condition with out modification. Normally these cars are not "raced" for reasons of risk....the risk of damaging a valuable piece of history and the safety related risks. these cars participate in static shows and occasionally exhibition laps. The purist in vintage racing appreciate these cars the most.
2.) Original equipment that has been modified for safety and dependability or a "period correct" replica of a specific type of race car. Normally a car without a significant (valuable and traceable) history. These cars are normally used for exhibitions and sometimes "friendly" racing....sometimes not-so-friendly racing. These cars provide fans and owners the opportunity to experience a walk down memory lane with out the expense of "all-out" racing.
3). All-out race cars with vintage bodies. These are race cars (hopefully) built with the latest competitive and safety considerations with "back-in-the-day bodies. These cars are normally raced in "run-what-you-brung" classes and provide some great entertainment to the fans.
We could break this down into further categories. Number two could easily be two categories. But most cars fit within these three groups.
I have seen clubs that successfully include all three types of these cars. I've seen clubs fall apart because they disagree on the definition of "vintage racing".
The most important factor is to keep our racing heritage alive.
Many clubs have failed due to their attempts to race unsafe cars. No one should risk their safety, a fellow racer's, or spectator's safety.No one should be allowed... at any track...to race unsafe equipment. The risks are too high...one of which is the future of vintage racing.
What are your opinions?
