NASCAR "Chase" Questions/Implications
General
Ernest, of course this has been the knock with the Chase since it's beginning. It is really just a short season with a short field. Obviously they created this to tighten things up to boost ratings but circumstances regardless of the system is what determines the outcome. How often can we expect a close battle for the title as in what happened to end the 1992 season ?
In addition there is no real difference with 13th place on back regardless of the format since it is the same for everyone at the beginning of the season. What the Chase does expose is that the top teams get a fist full of mulligans during mid to late summer. For instance, Jimmie Johnson won a bunch of races and knows he is going to get a high seed and without the Chase he would have no chance but here he is again leading the points. I stated previously on this forum that the 48 team purposely used a mulligan last year at the second Michigan race when JJ ran out of gas after leading over 130 laps. The season was over that very day long before the Chase started as Johnson finished in 33rd place. Would Chad let the 48 run out of fuel that without the Chase format ? I doubt it.
Nascar does not want a one race winner taking the trophy nor do they want somebody walking away with it by a large margin. So here it is and it is flawed.
The sanctioning body has been tweeking the system top to bottom but real racing fans and there are many right here, know what is up. Credibility has been lost in recent years as Nascar has fundamentaly changed the sport from top to bottom.
The mainstream medai says that Cup racing is better than ever and is extremely competitive. The statistics show that but when is the last time we have seen a photo finish, the bump and grind at Darlington or Bristol or a last lap pass for the win ?
It starts with the cars. They need to take the AERO out of them and we just me see some real racing that would make up for flaws with the point system what ever it may be.