Could we possibly convince NASCAR that they should have listened to Harry Gant when they went about "repurposing" the racing we used to love?
I just a read a five year old Rick Houston piece on NASCAR.com that is just as relevant today as it was when it was written.
http://www.nascar.com/2007/news/features/03/21/hgant.where.is/index.html
Check these Harry quotes from the story and tell me which don't fit today's problems?
Then ... there are the cars, which in Gant's opinion have been tinkered with, cut, raised, moved over, lengthened, shortened and tweaked far too much.
"I'll tell you what my honest opinion is ... and I told [NASCAR president] Mike Helton this," continued Gant, "even when I quit racing with the [Chevrolet] Lumina, it was pretty much just a regular Lumina. With the Oldsmobile, [the manufacturer] would send us sheet metal, and we'd use it.
"Now, they've started letting them do so much to these cars. They let you run a four-door car, but make a two-door out of it. The Ford Fusion ... that's an intermediate car, a little four-door, halfback thing. The Monte Carlo is the only car out there that's a two-door. They let you add a foot to the hood to fit the motor.
"They made a Dodge the ugliest thing I've ever seen in my life. They let 'em put the grille down where the bumper's at. They all look like they've run under a tractor-trailer and smashed the nose down. They've got this big problem ... aero push, aero push. Well ... if they would run 'em the way they was supposed to be, there wouldn't be no aero push. You wouldn't even need no Car of Tomorrow. ... I don't like that at all."
I had to look twice to see if I was reading Harry Gant's words or Bobby Williamson's words. Why can't they listen to some folks who know what they're talking about?
--
"Any Day is Good for Stock Car Racing"
updated by @dave-fulton: 12/05/16 04:04:08PM