AND LIFE WILL NEVER BE THE SAME......
Bill Hupp
Sunday October 11 2009, 8:42 AM
Early on February 18, I made preparations for one of my annual holidays. I had hosted Daytona 500 parties for years, inviting friends to shake off the winter doldrums with food, drink, and betting on who would win. This year would be different, however, my recent divorce forcing me into an apartment too small for such festivities. It didn't matter, it was still the holiday, it was still the sign of spring I waited for every year.The race was typical Daytona, large packs of resticted rush-hour traffic threatening to explode in a massive tangle. That threat was finally realised late when "The Big One" ruined many people's day and sent one gladiator airborne and tumbling. As always, my tension level was raised while awaiting official word, then an audible "whew" when it was announced everyone involved was OK.The remaining contenders took the restart and began running the final laps out. Two team mates drafted each other away from the pack behind them, and it seemed it would be settled between those two. The white flag, and coming through turns 3 and 4 another incident, much less spectacular than the one 20 laps previous, allowed no challenge to the team mates who motored easily to a 1-2 finish.I turned the television off, pleased with the holiday event, and set to other chores. Minutes later, a friend who had been a veteran of my parties called. "Sorry about your dude, man" she said. The driver who I normally favored in the betting had been involved in the last lap incident. "That's OK" I replied "He'll be pissed off, but he'll get over it". "No!" she said "He's dead!""Get outta Dodge!" I said "That crash wasn't that bad!" I immediatly turned on the TV again, and sure enough, they were announcing the passing of The Intimidator.I was shocked and somewhat saddened, but having watched motorsport in all it's forms for over 3 decades, I was not broken. Jimmy Clark, Ayrton Senna, Mark Donohue, I knew the greats were not immune to the risk. I also knew that racing would move on, just like it always had.But no. A 6- month investigation into the cause of his demise was launched. What is this? I wondered. They've never done this kind of thing for any other of the scores of fatals that I've seen over the years. More research, and massive changes that eventually resulted in today's SAFER barriers and COT and HANS collars. The incident made the cover of Time magazine, taking it from the grandstands to the mainstream. Seemingly overnight, death became no longer an accepted risk of the territory, and changes are made quickly, as evidenced by the NHRA's immediate decision to shorten their runs to 1000 feet after losing Scott Kalitta.Oh and one more thing. Six short months later, two airliners crashed into downtown New York.And life, like motorsport, will never be the same.
Bill Hupp
@bill-hupp   15 years ago
The deal with Senna, see, was you kinda knew it when it happened. The big shocker with Dale was it didn't look too bad at first, his sternum-breaking Talladega wreck looked much worse.Only upon seeing the replay a few times more did I see the right front wheel come off, and the wheels never come off without a massive hit.More the point of the story though was that since Dale exclusively, rather than a death resulting in the addition of a gravel trap or maybe one more bar in the cage, it now results in immediate and massive change, to sometimes the very face of the sport, as exampled by NHRA going 1000 feet, altering something that had literally always been."Acceptable risk" is no longer permitted. Good thing, bad thing, or just change?
Bill Hupp
@bill-hupp   15 years ago
Robbie my thoughts aren't so much on the technology of reducing risk as they are on the attitudes toward risk.Some of the "older" oldtimers on this site may have a better perspective, but I feel like if Jeff Gordon had made his "No one should have to take a hit like that" comment after getting the wind knocked out of him back when A.J. or Parnelli were running, he would have been laughed out of the sport.Again, it's not that I wish for injury or death, I am just curious at this seemingly sudden shift of mentality towards it, which seems to have been born with the Earnhardt incident.
Pete Banchoff
@pete-banchoff   15 years ago
Bill,I think attitudes have changed because the general public is so much more aware of the risks drivers are taking. The drivers have a pulpit to air any little thing that's on their mind and fans and press hang on every word. If the drivers mentality has truly changed, then why are so many running into the back of another car or spinning to win when they know it could result in a serious injury to someone else? In my view, they are taking more risks than ever before because of a safer track and car and they know they can get away with it... Until someone is seriously hurt or worse then it evolves again.Pete
Henry Jones
@henry-jones   15 years ago
Robbie, Bill, Pete and others.I keep holding my breath................................LeMans 1955. We have been so close on several occasions.Most NASCAR fans are not aware of that horrible accident so many years ago and I am amazed it has not yet happened again.Then, Big Brother gets involved.Then all of this dies.
Bill Hupp
@bill-hupp   15 years ago
Excellent points all, especially you Henry. The lawyers and the government would indeed kill everything about this sport should something like that happen again.I suppose all of us, especially me, should accept motorsport as it is, with all of it's big business, phantom cautions, and vanilla drivers, because at least it's still more or less racing, rather than having no racing at all.
Pete Banchoff
@pete-banchoff   15 years ago
You're right, Henry. Racing would go away.